<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rdf:RDF 
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:dcterms="http://purl.org/dc/terms/"
>
  <channel rdf:about="http://regulation.revues.org">
    <title>Revue de la régulation</title>
    <link>http://regulation.revues.org</link>
    <description>Revue de la régulation. Capitalisme, institutions, pouvoir. Revue semestrielle. La revue vise à fournir un lieu d’expression pour les analyses qui s’inscrivent dans la filiation des recherches régulationnistes ainsi que pour les chercheurs qui souhaitent en débattre.</description>        
    <items>    
      <rdf:Seq>      
        <rdf:li resource="http://regulation.revues.org/10029" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://regulation.revues.org/10023" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://regulation.revues.org/10022" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://regulation.revues.org/10021" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://regulation.revues.org/10026" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://regulation.revues.org/10024" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://regulation.revues.org/10025" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://regulation.revues.org/10027" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://regulation.revues.org/10028" />
        <rdf:li resource="http://regulation.revues.org/9996" />
              </rdf:Seq>  </items>  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://regulation.revues.org/10029">
    <title>Editorial</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Although not a single-topic issue of the journal, a thread does connect the various contributions to the current issue of the </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Régulation review</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">. </span>In fact, this issue reaffirms the links between the journal and a number of broader conversations and themes that lie at the heart of regulation theory. This is especially true of the critical issues of value and sustainable development, but it is equally valid in terms of our efforts to maintain dialogue with the currents of thought and authors involved in a range of contemporary debates. </p>
      <p class="texte">The jointly authored article by <a href="http://regulation.revues.org/9951">Luc Elie, Bertrand Zuindeau, Ali Douai, André Meunié, Mamoudou Camara, and Mathieu Bécue</a> on the diversity of institutional environmental systems of the OECD opens a discussion that supports a regulationist approach to environmental policy. Their contribution resituates the research agenda within a landscape that contains neoclassical and other forms of institutionalism, particularly the analysis of the varieties of capitali...</p>]]></description>
    <link>http://regulation.revues.org/10029</link>
    <dc:date>2013-01-29</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://regulation.revues.org/10021">
    <title>Introduction</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Our call for submissions on the subject of ‘Institutions, regulation and development’ aroused so much interest that the articles selected have given rise to two special sections (issues 6 and 7). The contributions relate mainly to the debates presently underway and approaches feeding academic research on institutions, regulation and development.</span></p>
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">The retrospective aspect, which involves a critical review of Regulation theory research in the study of development, has been addressed by Noureddine El Aoufi (issue 6). The author questions the relations between a school of thought – the Regulation school – and a field of investigation – development economics.</span></p>
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">The success encountered by the call for submissions attracted contributions more oriented towards contemporary theoretical and empirical issues, as reflected in the particularly large place accorded to the ‘Opinion-Debates’ section.</span></p>
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">In recent years, new branches have emerged within development economics and this phenomenon provides Véro...</span></p>]]></description>
    <link>http://regulation.revues.org/10021</link>
    <dc:date>2012-12-28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://regulation.revues.org/10022">
    <title>Introduction</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Our call for submissions on the subject of ‘Institutions, regulation and development’ aroused so much interest that the articles selected have given rise to two special sections (issues 6 and 7). The contributions relate mainly to the debates presently underway and approaches feeding academic research on institutions, regulation and development.</span></p>
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">The retrospective aspect, which involves a critical review of Regulation theory research in the study of development, has been addressed by Noureddine El Aoufi (issue 6). The author questions the relations between a school of thought – the Regulation school – and a field of investigation – development economics.</span></p>
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">The success encountered by the call for submissions attracted contributions more oriented towards contemporary theoretical and empirical issues, as reflected in the particularly large place accorded to the ‘Opinion-Debates’ section.</span></p>
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">In recent years, new branches have emerged within development economics and this phenomenon provides Véro...</span></p>]]></description>
    <link>http://regulation.revues.org/10022</link>
    <dc:date>2012-12-28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://regulation.revues.org/10023">
    <title>From financialization of economies to evaluation of economists</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Unlike recent issues of the </span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Revue de la Régulation. Régulation Review</span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, this one does not include a special thematic issue. Nevertheless, two related questions run through it: financial governance and the importance of rankings for research evaluations and subsidies.</span></p>
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">The first two articles deal with the way rankings of research activity, on the one hand, and the qualification – or rather, quantification – of knowledge, on the other, are produced. These rankings imply a competition between researchers and universities. The well-known Shanghai Ranking (ARWU), which is closely interpreted here by Jean-Charles Billaut, Denis Bouyssou and Philippe Vyncke, is indicative of the numerous biases and failings of such rankings. David Pontille and Didier Torny’s meticulous study on the genesis of the rankings of economics and management journals is the first of a series of articles, from a sociological perspective in particular, which will deal with the social construction of the economist’s prof...</span></p>]]></description>
    <link>http://regulation.revues.org/10023</link>
    <dc:date>2012-12-28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://regulation.revues.org/10024">
    <title>Editorial</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">This ninth issue of the </span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Revue de la Régulation. Régulation Review </span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">provides an opportunity for further reflection on the transformations of contemporary capitalism through an examination of the concept of </span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">corporate social responsibility</span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> (CSR) and its ability to play a role in the shaping of new compromises. The CSR institutionalisation process grants normative power to the companies and their management, notably at the expense of labour representatives. This important issue of power is thus explored in our special section, ‘Corporate social responsibility, regulation and diversity of capitalism’. As the title indicates, two central ideas, or questions, run through the articles in this section. On the one hand, the variety of practices and normative processes clearly seems to support the thesis of the diversity of capitalisms, a diversity which is illustrated by the multiple sectors and national arenas studied here. On the other hand, the issues of regulations, norms and power which a...</span></p>]]></description>
    <link>http://regulation.revues.org/10024</link>
    <dc:date>2012-12-28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://regulation.revues.org/10025">
    <title>Editorial</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">This tenth issue of the </span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Revue de la Régulation</span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> reopens the dialogue between neo-Keynesian theory and Regulationist theory which was initiated in our very first issue through an interview with post-Keynesian economist </span><a href="http://regulation.revues.org/1305?&#38;id=1305"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Marc Lavoie</span></a><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">. The exchange continues in the special section entitled ‘Post-Keynesianism and Regulation theory: shared perspectives’, where Englebert Stockhammer, interviewed by Robert Boyer and Mikaël Clévenot, reviews the stumbling blocks and meeting points between the two approaches. These questions are also addressed by Mark Setterfield, who emphasises the possible points of convergence. In a comparative reading of such potential, awaited and sometimes missed encounters, Robert Boyer explores ways of overcoming the obstacles to this intellectual exchange which is, in his view, quite beneficial. Angel Asensio, Sébastien Charles, Dany Lang and Edwin Le Heron, meanwhile, insist on the essential meeting points through a review of recent post-Keynesian studies. And the you...</span></p>]]></description>
    <link>http://regulation.revues.org/10025</link>
    <dc:date>2012-12-28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://regulation.revues.org/10026">
    <title>Editorial</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">The present issue of the </span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Revue de la Régulation. Régulation Review</span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> marks a new step in the long history of the ties between Regulationist researchers and Latin America, and at the same time, a new step for the journal itself.</span></p>
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">The crises and their multiplicity of forms over time and space, along with the surprisingly diverse reconfigurations taking place in Latin America, allow us to discover the great variety of capitalisms as well as the power of social and political compromises in the emergence of national regulation processes. The economies of these countries are far from resembling a variant of Fordism. Nor are they making their ways towards a single model, because the patterns of industrialisation and development are often quite original; indeed, some display certain features of a rentier regime exporting raw materials.</span></p>
      <p class="texte">For the Revue de la Régulation. <span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Régulation Review</span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">, one of the determinant factors behind this special issue is the very precocious nature of Regulationist studies...</span></p>]]></description>
    <link>http://regulation.revues.org/10026</link>
    <dc:date>2012-12-28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://regulation.revues.org/10027">
    <title>Éditorial</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="texte">Les théories hétérodoxes, et en particulier la théorie de la régulation, retrouveraient-elles une nouvelle jeunesse avec la reconnaissance <em>officielle</em> et très médiatique de la crise ? Cette dernière, n’est-elle pas née dans les années 1970, dans un contexte de crise ? La relation dialectique entre croissance et crise, entre le capitalisme en régime et ses crises, constitue une clé méthodologique. Chacun se souviendra également de la distinction établie en 1979, et ayant fait florès depuis, entre <em>petite</em> et <em>grande</em> crises. À l’aune de cette typologie, la crise financière devenue manifeste pour tous en septembre 2008 s’inscrit assurément dans une <em>grande</em> crise, c'est-à-dire une période marquée par l’impossibilité pour le capitalisme, livré à une finance dérégulée, de permettre une croissance durable et une situation prolongée de plein emploi.</p>
      <p class="texte">Pour autant, si la crise actuelle marque la fin d’une époque, celle d’un régime d’accumulation tiré par la finance, nombreuses sont les questions aux...</p>]]></description>
    <link>http://regulation.revues.org/10027</link>
    <dc:date>2012-12-28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://regulation.revues.org/10028">
    <title>Editorial</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">Will heterodox theories, and Regulation theory in particular, gain a new lease on life with the </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">official </span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">recognition of the crisis (and its high media visibility)? After all, Regulation theory was born in the 1970s in another context of crisis. The dialectical relationship between growth and crisis, between capitalism as regime and its crises, offers a methodological tool. And it is also worth recalling the distinction established in 1979, and which has flourished ever since, between </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">minor</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> and </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">major</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> crises.</span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"></span><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> Within this typology, the financial crisis which became evident to everyone in September 2008 is clearly a </span><em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">major</span></em><span xml:lang="en" lang="en"> crisis, namely a period marked by the impossibility for a capitalism handed over to deregulated finance to permit sustainable growth and any long-term situation of full employment.</span></p>
      <p class="texte"><span xml:lang="en" lang="en">That said, if the present crisis marks the end of an era – that of a finance-driven accumulation regime – there are still many questions facing economic thought as a whole and standard econom...</span></p>]]></description>
    <link>http://regulation.revues.org/10028</link>
    <dc:date>2012-12-28</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://regulation.revues.org/9996">
    <title>Gallois Florence, Une approche régulationniste des mutations de la configuration institutionnelle française des services à la personne</title>
    <description><![CDATA[
      <p class="resume">La thèse interroge la possibilité d’une régulation unique du secteur des services à la personne tel qu’il a été institutionnellement délimité par le Plan Borloo de 2005. Nous y défendons l’idée que, si le Plan Borloo n’a pas permis de générer un secteur unifié, (au sens que lui donne les approches en termes de régulation sectorielle), les dispositifs visant la construction d’un marché des services à la personne, qu’il a introduits, sont mobilisés à la fois par les nouveaux entrants et par les acteurs historiques du champ, mais de façon non homogène et différente de ce que le Plan anticipait. Il en résulte une situation de double crise (crise des enseignes et crises des associations autorisées) que les conclusions de la thèse permettent d’éclairer.</p>]]></description> 
    <dc:creator>Florence Gallois</dc:creator>
    <link>http://regulation.revues.org/9996</link>
    <dc:date>2012-12-20</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>